Free Trading + Demat + Mutual Fund + 0 AMC

Free Trading + Demat + Mutual Fund + 0 AMC
Click the image to open account

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

The actual problem with OIL


The world’s biggest producer of crude, found itself in an unusual situation: its oil was less than worthless. 
The price of the benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures contract crashed into negative territory for the first time in its history. The slide is the result of both global phenomena and local conditions. Around the world the supply of oil far exceeds demand for it, as governments try to limit the spread of covid-19. 
Reasons for the fall
Citizens are no longer driving to work... planes remain on the ground. Steps to restrain production and support prices have been grand in scope but so far limited in effect.
The demand for oil has taken a severe hit across the world due to coronavirus-forced lockdowns. On April 10, the storage at Cushing, Oklahoma, the hub of the US pipeline network, was nearly 72 per cent full, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
In March and April American producers continued to pump, even as refineries refused their oil and storage tanks filled quickly. April 21st is the last trading day for oil to be delivered in May to Cushing, Oklahoma, the physical hub for futures traded in New York. The plunge in WTI on April 20th reflected the panicked realisation that oil may have nowhere to go.
Not every oil producer faces so acute a problem. The international benchmark, Brent crude, which is produced in the North Sea and can more easily be placed in tankers, has fallen steeply, but not as far as WTI (see chart). Indeed tanker rates have soared as producers and traders seek to fill ships with crude. Spot charter rates for crude tankers in early April topped $200,000 a day, according to Morgan Stanley, compared with about $40,000 a day last year. Such rates reflect some traders’ bet that they can wait out the price slump at sea.
Trump's efforts and plan
America’s president helped broker the OPEC deal and insisted last week that the industry would recover “far faster” than anticipated. Mr Trump is now reportedly weighing a plan to pay frackers to keep their oil below ground. That idea may win him support in Texas and North Dakota, but Congress is unlikely to approve it. The legislature already rejected an earlier proposal to buy American crude for the country’s strategic petroleum reserve.
The problem
More companies may keep their oil below ground, whether Mr Trump pays them or not. Since the crisis began Canada, Iraq and Venezuela have accounted for the majority of production shut-ins, according to Rystad Energy, a data firm and consultancy. Producers often continue to operate at a loss rather than halt output, as it can be costly to restart operations and a shut reservoir may be damaged permanently. Shale operators have been loth to accept that fate. Soon they may have no choice.